How Nektar Helps AI Hypergrowth Companies Move Even Faster
- Artificial Intelligence
- 10 min
Fast-moving AI companies are having a moment.
Every week a new AI-native startup crosses $100M ARR in what feels like record time. Accel’s 2025 Globalscape report shows a “new breed of AI-native applications” hitting scale much faster than previous generations of SaaS, with some reaching $100M ARR in just a few years.
That velocity is backed by unprecedented capital. Prominent AI companies like Cursor, Writer, Groq and Fireworks are raising huge rounds, hiring at triple-digit growth rates, and building products that spread virally from individual builders into the world’s largest enterprises. AI application categories like developer tools, finance, cybersecurity and vertical AI each attracted multiple billions of dollars in 2025 funding alone.
Nektar sits right in the middle of this wave. Over the past year, we’ve partnered with some of the fastest-growing AI companies in the US – including Writer, Cursor, Groq, Chainguard and Fireworks to help them turn raw go-to-market activity into clean, structured, AI-ready data they can actually execute on.
This blog looks at why AI companies grow differently, what that does to their GTM data, and how Nektar helps them grow even faster.
The new AI growth curve: Speed, Efficiency and Youth
Funding and company maturity
Accel’s data makes one thing clear: AI is no longer a niche category. It’s the new centre of gravity for software investing.
- Total EU/US/IL cloud & AI funding (excluding models) has climbed into the ~$180B+ range annually, with 2025 setting fresh records.
- AI model funding is heavily concentrated in the US, but on the application side, EU/IL funding now represents roughly two-thirds of US levels, showing how global this wave has become.
- The winners look very different from the last SaaS cycle: over 65% of the Accel US & Europe AI 100 are 0–3 years old, and US winners skew especially young at 2.4 years on average.
Put simply: AI companies are raising big, hiring fast, and still figuring out their GTM motion on the fly.
Bottom-up adoption and insane efficiency
AI-native tools are spreading from the bottom up:
- Developers using AI coding assistants jumped from 36% in 2023 to 90% in 2025 – in just two years.
- Tools like AI IDEs, agents and copilots are hitting milestones such as “$100M ARR in 8 months” and “10x YoY growth,” according to Accel’s case studies of leading AI-native apps.
This isn’t just fast growth – it’s efficient growth. Accel estimates that leading AI applications now generate 3–10x more ARR per employee than prior generations of SaaS companies.
But that speed and efficiency create a GTM paradox:
You can scale product adoption and revenue incredibly fast. But your GTM data, process and tooling often lag badly behind.
The hidden tax of hypergrowth: messy GTM data
Most fast-growing AI companies share a few traits:
- They sell into large, multi-person buying committees (Fortune 500, Global 2000, high-growth tech).
- They run hybrid motions – PLG bottoms-up adoption plus enterprise sales, often with heavy founder-led or executive-led outbound.
- Their GTM stack is complex and evolving: Salesforce + Gong + Snowflake + ABM + sequencing tools, changing every few quarters.
- They are young – which means processes, definitions and data hygiene were rarely “designed,” they just happened.
That shows up in four chronic problems:
- Invisible buying groups
Activity sits at the account or activity object level, not tied to which humans are actually influencing a deal. Contact roles are incomplete, incorrect, or simply not used. - Multi-threading that’s impossible to measure
Leadership wants reps and CSMs to multi-thread. But nobody can answer basic questions like:- “How many net new stakeholders did this SDR actually bring in?”
- “Which deals progressed because we pulled in the economic buyer early?”
- “How many net new stakeholders did this SDR actually bring in?”
- Broken marketing attribution for enterprise deals
First-touch and last-touch models collapse when there are 10–20 stakeholders, dozens of events and campaigns, and long sales cycles. “Marketing sourced” covers only a small fraction of reality. - No shared view of the customer journey
Pre-pipeline engagement, in-pipeline meetings, onboarding, success reviews, expansion conversations – they live in different systems owned by different teams.
This is exactly the gap Nektar is built to fill.
Nektar as the data backbone for AI GTM
At its core, Nektar is a revenue data platform that:
- Harvests metadata from communication tools (email, calendar, meetings, sequences).
- Cleans and transforms that data.
- Writes it into Salesforce against the right opportunities, accounts, contacts and leads.
- Automatically creates and updates Opportunity Contact Roles (OCRs) with accurate personas (economic buyer, champion, influencer, etc.).
- Generates revenue signals that help teams act – from “missing exec sponsor” to “multi-threading risk” to “QBR overdue.”
Writer is a great illustration of how fast-moving AI companies use this foundation
Writer: building an AI-ready GTM engine on top of Nektar
Writer is an enterprise AI platform selling into Fortune 500 and Global 2000 organizations. Their GTM complexity is huge: multi-persona deals, long cycles, and a mix of PLG, partner, and enterprise motions.
One activity capture layer for Sales, CS and Marketing
Writer started with Nektar in sales, then expanded to sales engineering, customer success and now marketing.
Nektar:
- Captures emails, meetings and other activities from tools like Gmail and calendar.
- Associates them correctly with accounts, opportunities and contacts in Salesforce.
- Backfills historical data by “travelling back in time” across past emails and calendars, so data isn’t limited to post-implementation activity.
- Creates missing contacts and writes them into Salesforce as OCRs with mapped personas.
Compared with their previous setup (Gong plus internal workarounds), Writer’s RevOps leaders called out that Nektar simply does a better job of capturing and correctly associating activities, especially in complex account structures with multiple open opportunities.
This gives Writer a single, reliable activity dataset they can push into their warehouse (GCP) and model in Omni for analytics – a critical enabler for AI-driven GTM.
Making multi-threading measurable (and compensable)
Writer wants SDRs and AEs to multi-thread aggressively – and they want to pay them for doing it.
The problem: Nektar was so good at capturing meeting participants that it could add OCRs before SDRs had a chance to manually create them. Great for data hygiene, terrible for incentive tracking.
Together, Writer and Nektar designed rules like:
- A “net new OCR” only counts if:
- The contact was created after opportunity creation.
- The SDR is the meeting organizer.
- It’s a net-new person relative to prior meetings (using a unique meeting/thread ID to dedupe).
- The contact was created after opportunity creation.
Nektar’s pipeline of event data and OCR creation logic now supports:
- Fair SDR compensation for true net-new stakeholder additions.
- Analysis of which reps actually multi-thread, and how that correlates with win rates and deal size.
- Separation of pre-pipeline vs in-pipeline engagement so they can “reverse engineer” how much top-of-funnel activity is needed to create pipeline of a given quality and size.
Buying-group level marketing attribution
Writer’s marketing ops leader, Kyle Brown, is pushing beyond traditional attribution.
Historically, Writer had:
- A first-touch model based on the primary contact’s earliest lead source.
- Low usage of campaign member data.
- Limited visibility into the true influence of marketing on enterprise pipeline.
With Nektar, Writer is:
- Using OCR personas as the backbone of attribution
Nektar clusters existing titles and roles in Salesforce to map them to buyer personas (economic buyer, champion, influencer, etc.), and refines that mapping with Writer’s feedback. - Linking campaigns to the right humans
Instead of asking “which campaigns touched this account?” they ask:
“Which campaigns touched the 10–15 people Nektar knows are actually in the buying group for this opportunity?” - Building account-level attribution models in Omni
Writer pipes Nektar’s OCR data and Salesforce campaign members into their warehouse, then models:- What % of opportunities had at least one marketing touch on a key persona.
- Which plays (VIP events, webinars, partner motions) consistently show up in successful deals.
- What % of opportunities had at least one marketing touch on a key persona.
In one period, shifting to buying-group-based attribution increased the share of qualified opportunities showing a marketing touch from ~20% (old lead-source model) to 57% once Nektar’s OCR data was included – a dramatic reframing of marketing’s true impact on pipeline.
Customer journey, signals and capacity planning
On the post-sale side, Writer is using Nektar to make Customer Success more predictable and scalable:
- Customer journey mapping
Writer is defining the “ideal journey” – kickoff, exec alignment, onboarding milestones, adoption checkpoints – and labelling meeting types so Nektar can categorize them. That enables questions like:- “Show all accounts in onboarding that haven’t had an executive alignment call.”
- “Which renewals in the next 90 days are missing recent VP-level engagement?”
- “Show all accounts in onboarding that haven’t had an executive alignment call.”
- Capacity planning for services and CS
By analyzing historical Nektar activity (call counts, types, seniority of participants), Writer can estimate:- How much pre- and post-work each call type requires.
- How many heads they’ll need to support a given segment or services model.
- How much pre- and post-work each call type requires.
- AI-driven signals
Nektar gives Writer’s RevOps team the ability to configure complex signals like:- “Business review completed with economic buyer in last 90 days.”
- “No executive sponsor touch since last expansion conversation.”
- “Number of stakeholders engaged in onboarding below threshold.”
- “Business review completed with economic buyer in last 90 days.”
These signals can be pushed into Salesforce – and eventually Slack – so deal and account risks are surfaced where teams already live.
Founder/Exec-led growth tracking
Writer also runs high-touch, founder-led outreach from founders to C-level executives.
Nektar is powering a Salesforce view that:
- Captures leadership outbound emails and all replies.
- Creates or updates contacts automatically, including when new executives respond.
- Brings Gmail label data into Salesforce so emails can be grouped by themes, events or cohorts.
- Adds thread IDs so the ops team can analyze entire conversation sequences.
That gives Writer a structured, reportable dataset for what was previously a dark funnel of “founder magic,” and lets them connect it directly to leads, opportunities and revenue.
Cursor and buying-committee hygiene: turning noise into signal
AI coding tools like Cursor are classic examples of products that explode from individual developer adoption into complex, multi-stakeholder enterprise deals.
For companies like Cursor, Nektar focuses on buying committee hygiene – making sure every human that matters in a deal is visible, enriched and scored.
A few principles stand out:
Conditional OCR creation – only the right people
Simply adding every email recipient or meeting attendee as an OCR creates noise. Instead, Nektar lets RevOps teams define precise rules in our backend:
- Only create OCRs if:
- The contact attended more than one meeting and sent more than one email.
- The contact’s title meets certain seniority or function criteria.
- The opportunity owner (or a specific role) was on the activity.
- The opportunity is a new logo / enterprise tier / above a threshold ACV.
- The contact attended more than one meeting and sent more than one email.
- Never create OCRs from:
- Activities with more than X external participants (e.g., webinars, onboarding events).
- Renewal opportunities if you’re analysing only new business.
- Activities with more than X external participants (e.g., webinars, onboarding events).
These rules are expressed as configurable “custom code” (JSONata expressions) that Nektar manages, so teams like Cursor can tailor buying-group creation without building and maintaining their own integration logic.
In one implementation, this approach took a raw set of 13K+ potential OCRs (anyone on emails or meetings) and distilled them down to ~2.3K truly relevant buyers using title and engagement thresholds – a 5–6x reduction in noise.
Engagement scoring for every stakeholder
For each member of the buying committee, Nektar calculates an engagement score using inputs such as:
- Emails sent/received.
- Meetings attended or declined.
- Time since last touch.
- Sentiment from email and meeting transcripts.
That lets AI companies:
- Prioritize follow-up with economic buyers or champions whose engagement is dipping.
- Spot “shadow champions” – mid-level or technical stakeholders with unexpectedly high engagement.
- Compare engagement patterns between won and lost deals to refine playbooks.
Meeting-level visibility into the buying group
Nektar creates parent–child events in Salesforce so that:
- A single calendar event or Zoom/Teams call can be associated with multiple participants.
- Each participant is mapped back to their account, contact and opportunity records.
- Custom activity types (e.g., “use case expansion,” “technical deep dive”) are tagged using CS-configured logic.
This makes it easy to answer questions like:
- “Which personas have actually seen a product demo on this deal?”
- “Are we over-relying on one champion without enough exec coverage?”
Fast historical backfill
AI companies can’t wait 6–12 months for clean data. Nektar backfills years of email and meeting history in a couple of weeks, automatically populating OCRs and engagement scores on both closed and open opportunities.
For RevOps teams at Cursor-type companies, that means:
- A baseline view of buying groups across the entire active and closed-won pipeline, not just new deals.
- The ability to benchmark current deals against past successful patterns from day one.
- Minimal implementation effort – some customers go live in about a week.
Groq, Fireworks and the AI infra GTM challenge
Infrastructure-focused AI companies like Groq and Fireworks operate in yet another dimension of complexity:
- They sell to deeply technical buyers plus exec sponsors and procurement.
- Deals are often platform-level decisions that can reshape entire product strategies.
- GTM motions combine high-touch enterprise sales, ecosystem partners, and heavy POC/benchmark cycles.
While their specific deployments are unique, the patterns are similar:
- Reveal and map the full technical + business buying group
Nektar automatically surfaces everyone involved in POCs, benchmarks, eval calls and architecture reviews – not just the main account team. - Tie GTM engagement to usage and adoption
By feeding Nektar’s cleaned OCR and activity data into the data warehouse alongside product telemetry, infra companies can see how stakeholder engagement correlates with POC success, time-to-go-live and expansion. - Give leadership a reliable pipeline health view
With AI-native products selling into other AI builders, infra companies move fast. Nektar’s signals – exec coverage, multi-threading score, next QBR, last technical deep dive – help revenue leaders inspect pipeline by behavioural reality, not just stage fields.
Chainguard: Building GTM Infrastructure for Escape Velocity
Chainguard sits at the intersection of infrastructure and security—a category that includes companies like Wiz that have achieved remarkable scale. Like many hypergrowth AI and security companies, Chainguard is scaling rapidly: expanding their sales team significantly, growing internationally, and evolving from a single product to a multi-product platform.
That velocity creates a specific challenge: how do you build the GTM infrastructure to support scale before scale breaks your processes?
Why Activity Data Matters for Coaching at Scale
Parm Uppal, Chainguard’s CRO, brings a clear philosophy: “Sales is a science, not an art.” And science requires data.
When evaluating Chainguard’s tooling stack, one requirement was non-negotiable: “If you need detailed activity capture to build everything off. Because I can’t go and coach first-line leaders how to run world-class Monday one-on-ones if they haven’t got the data.”
Chainguard was using Clari for forecasting, with some auto activity capture running in the background. But as the team evaluated their needs, they found there wasn’t the level of depth and granularity required to answer the questions that actually drive coaching and improvement.
The Blind Spot Fast-Growing Companies Miss
When asked what blind spot fast-growing companies risk ignoring, Parm’s answer was direct:
“They confuse the fact that they can see activity data in Gong and Clari with knowing what to do with it. Here’s what happens: they’ll shout at the scoreboard. They’ll say ‘you’re not doing enough meetings’ and pull up a dashboard. That’s the equivalent of the dad at the kids’ soccer game saying ‘score more goals.’ That ain’t helping anybody.”
The real questions require clean, foundational data:
- On a typical new logo deal at a given ACV, how many people do I need to meet? How many different personas? How long does it take?
- How does that vary between US and EMEA? Between different regions?
- Which deals have the right exec coverage versus single-threaded risk?
“Until you have core trust in the meeting activity data, you can’t triangulate anything else.”
Multi-Persona Selling Requires Multi-Threaded Visibility
Chainguard sells to three distinct personas—what Parm calls “the three legs of the stool”: Engineering, Security, and Infrastructure. The winning motion requires engaging multiple stakeholders across these groups.
“Security has the power to point at the problem—they don’t always have the power to remediate. I need to see which personas we’re reaching and which we’re missing, so I can coach reps on how to adjust their approach.”
With a rapidly growing sales team spanning multiple geographies, this visibility becomes critical. Nektar’s buying group intelligence automatically surfaces which personas have been engaged on each deal, tracks engagement depth by stakeholder type, and flags gaps in coverage before they become lost deals.
From Vision to Execution
Parm’s vision is a system where the metrics that matter—ASP growth, rep contribution, time to ramp, productivity—can be tracked not just at the company level, but by cohort: Enterprise vs. Commercial, Americas vs. EMEA, SDR-sourced vs. event-sourced.
Nektar provides the foundational data layer that makes this possible: capturing activities automatically, creating contacts and OCRs, tagging meeting types, and piping structured data into the warehouse where Chainguard can build the analytics they need to scale efficiently.
As Parm puts it: “If the data foundation is clean, I can pump it into my data warehouse, pull it into BI or AI tools, and start asking the questions that actually help reps and leaders get better.”
Why this matters now: AI companies can’t afford bad data
Accel’s Globalscape shows AI-native companies:
- Are growing ARR incredibly fast.
- Are operating with far higher ARR/FTE efficiency.
- Are overwhelmingly young – with 65%+ of the leading AI/cloud winners less than three years from founding.
That combination creates both an opportunity and a risk.
- Opportunity: AI companies can build their GTM data foundation right from the beginning – not bolt-on fixes 10 years in.
- Risk: If they don’t, their own AI ambitions (whether for GTM agents, predictive health scores, or AI-driven forecasting) will be running on the same messy, incomplete CRM data that held back the last generation of SaaS.
Nektar’s work with Writer, Cursor and other fast-moving AI leaders shows what “getting it right” looks like:
- Every stakeholder in every deal is visible, enriched and scored.
- Pre-pipeline, in-pipeline and post-sale engagement live in one connected layer.
- RevOps, Marketing, Sales, CS and Data teams all work off the same structured truth and can build their own models and signals on top of it.
In a world where AI budgets, agents and automation are exploding, the companies that win will be the ones that treat GTM data itself as a first-class product.
Fast-moving AI companies are already redefining how software is built and sold.
Nektar exists so that their revenue engines can keep up.

Bhaswati
Director of Content Marketing at Nektar.ai, an AI-led contact and activity capture solution for revenue teams. With 11+ years of experience, I specialize in crafting engaging content across blogs, podcasts, social media, and premium resources. I also host The Revenue Lounge podcast, sharing insights from revenue leaders.