Welcome to
The Revenue Lounge
How to Influence Buying Groups with Data, Intent, and ABM
A conversation with Sydney Sloan, Chief Market Officer at G2.





B2B buying has transformed.
What was once a one-on-one sales conversation is now a team sport, spanning roles, departments, and even geographies. Today’s buyers are informed, autonomous, and collaborative. They’re forming buying groups long before sales ever enters the conversation. And if your go-to-market (GTM) team isn’t aligned to this reality, you’re already playing catch-up.
In this episode of The Revenue Lounge, Randy Likas sits down with Sydney Sloan, Chief Market Officer at G2, to unpack how marketing and sales teams can evolve to influence modern buying groups. She is a 4X CMO, board member and advisor with decades of experience in driving transformative growth and innovation for high-tech companies. Sydney offers a masterclass in using data, intent signals, and segmentation to win complex deals.
Here’s a breakdown of the conversation—and why it matters.
🚨 Why Buying Groups Matter More Than Ever
The traditional lead-based model is failing. As Sydney puts it, “MQLs are noise.” They flood sales with contacts that aren’t ready to buy—leading to frustration, wasted time, and missed opportunities.
Instead, modern revenue teams must focus on identifying buying groups—clusters of stakeholders from the same account showing interest in your solution. These signals can come from downloading content, comparing vendors, visiting your pricing page, or just quietly researching on review platforms.
A single lead might lie. But a buying group rarely does.
“When you have executive alignment and more than three people in the buying cycle, close rates are 44% higher.”
– Sydney Sloan, CMO, G2
🧠 Data Is the Foundation. But it Needs to Be Smart
Sydney breaks down three types of intent data:
Third-party: Activity across the open web (e.g., searches, keyword trends).
Second-party: Data from trusted ecosystems like G2—category views, comparisons, reviews.
First-party: Visitor behavior on your own website, CRM engagement history, and sales activity.
The magic happens when you triangulate these data sources. For instance, if someone downloaded your whitepaper (first-party), compared your product with a competitor on G2 (second-party), and searched relevant terms online (third-party)—you’ve got a red-hot buying group signal.
But here’s the catch: if your CRM is a mess or your systems are siloed, you’ll never connect those dots.
“There’s no excuse not to have tier 1 and 2 accounts built out with clean, up-to-date contacts across buying personas.”
🔁 The New GTM Playbook: From Leads to Stakeholders
Moving to a buying group strategy requires more than good data—it requires GTM alignment.
Instead of chasing individual MQLs, Sydney recommends:
Scoring accounts, not contacts.
Tracking signals at the account level to prioritize outreach.
Rethinking SDR metrics: focus on meetings with multiple personas, not just any meeting.
Partnering marketing, sales, and product around a shared account strategy.
Sydney shares how G2 moved to an account-based model where the sales team gets tailored engagement strategies based on segment (SMB, mid-market, enterprise). Every team member—from demand gen to product marketing—knows who their core personas are and how they relate to each other.
🧩 Operationalizing Buying Groups at Scale
At Forrester’s recent event, a key theme emerged: evolving from “buying groups” to “buying networks.” This includes partners, peers, analysts, and ecosystems that influence buyer decisions.
Sydney highlights a few scalable tactics to work with buying groups:
Persona Workshops: G2 ran hands-on workshops using real Gong quotes to help every department internalize customer personas.
Segmented Campaigns: Instead of generic ABM, G2 builds micro-segments like “Security companies using 6sense, not yet G2 customers,” and tailors messaging accordingly.
Pipeline Meetings: Marketing, sales, and SDRs review the same data together bi-weekly to troubleshoot stuck opportunities and improve velocity.
Deal Acceleration Programs: Everyone in stage 2 of the pipeline gets invited to bi-weekly virtual events to deepen relationships and drive conversion.
⚖️ Brand vs. Demand: It’s Not Either/Or
Many companies struggle with where to invest: long-term brand or short-term pipeline.
Sydney makes it clear: do both, early and often.
Brand earns you a seat at the table. G2’s Buyer Behavior Report shows average vendor shortlists are down to just three.
Demand capture turns that attention into pipeline.
“Brand is giving something away with no ask. Demand is giving something away to capture a contact. Different plays, both essential.”
📈 Rethinking KPIs for Buying Group Success
MQLs are out. So what’s in?
Sydney advocates for shared KPIs across marketing and sales focused on:
Pipeline creation
Closed-won revenue
Retention
Internally, marketing can track velocity, lead-to-meeting time, and program-level cost-per-lead. But in cross-functional pipeline meetings, everyone should speak the same language: revenue.
🧹 The Data Problem: Why RevOps Must Lead
One of the biggest blockers to activating buying group strategies is messy, siloed data. Marketing tools hoard information. Sales tools don’t sync well. And critical insights never make it to the opportunity record.
The solution? A strong Revenue Operations team.
“I’ve surrendered. Marketing Ops now sits in RevOps—and that’s a good thing. RevOps should own the data foundation.”
Clean data doesn’t just support GTM alignment—it powers AI and automation. And as Sydney warns, “Bad data trains bad agents.”
🚀 Final Takeaways: Winning with Buying Groups
Buying groups are real—and they convert better. Track and engage multiple stakeholders early.
-
Use intent signals across data types. Build workflows that treat G2 comparisons and pricing page visits as bottom-of-funnel signals.
-
Go beyond ABM. Focus on micro-segments to tell sharper, more personalized stories.
-
Align GTM with shared KPIs. Eliminate the MQL silo and focus on revenue outcomes.
-
Fix your data. Clean, enriched CRM data is essential for sales, marketing, and AI.
Want to build a buying group motion that works?
Start by getting your GTM teams aligned, your data house in order, and your content strategy laser-focused on each persona in the buying network.
And if you’re still chasing MQLs, it might be time to hit pause—and rebuild for the way B2B buying actually works today.
Want to hear more stories from revenue leaders? Subscribe to The Revenue Lounge podcast to never miss an episode!
More Resources

A 30-60-90 Day Guide for First-Time Directors of Revenue Operations
A 30-60-90 Day Guide for First-Time Directors of Revenue Operations RevOps 10 min Starting a new job as a Director of Revenue Operations is an exciting opportunity to make a significant impact on a company’s revenue growth. To ensure success in this role, it’s essential to have a strategic plan that guides your actions during the crucial first three months. Here’s a 30-60-90 day plan that will help you strategically manage revenue operations and drive sustainable growth. We recently spoke to Hassan Irshad, Director of RevOps at FEVTutor. He shared his approach to this powerful framework, demonstrating how each phase (30, 60, and 90 days) builds strategically upon the last to deliver alignment, trust, and sustained improvement. By breaking down complex goals into achievable milestones, the 30-60-90 day approach empowers RevOps leaders to initiate meaningful change without overwhelming teams. For all the RevOps leaders, it’s a way to approach change with purpose, driving measurable impact and laying the groundwork for long-term success. The 30-60–90 day framework must be an indispensable tool and here is how you can implement progressive, sustainable growth strategies from day one. First 30 days for a Director of Revenue Operations The purpose should be to gather insights and understand the organization, especially the needs and challenges of different teams. 1. Goals for first 30 days: i. Meet Key Stakeholders Meet with cross departmental teams like Finance, HR, and Sales to understand their goals, challenges, and priorities. ii. Document Everything Create a “lay of the land” document summarizing findings on different team goals, challenges, and processes. iii. Understand the Product Take product demos, listen to sales calls, and use tools that show how the product is sold. This helps in understanding the customer needs better. iv. Dive into Your CRM Understand your CRM (whether Salesforce or HubSpot) to assess how the data is organized. This is to check whether it’s easy to use, and identify immediate improvements. The CRM should be the central source of truth, with other tools supporting it. The data should be unified with easier adoption for the teams. v. Build Trust Internally Establish trust within your teams by listening carefully, asking questions about how RevOps can help, and addressing quick fixes to show you’re there to help. Having this trust shows them that you’re here to support their success. Quick wins, such as small fixes that make people’s jobs easier, helps in establishing credibility early. 2. Establish Clear KPIs i. Understanding Team KPIs It is important to ask you stakeholders about the KPIs that matter to understand their goals and what their expectations are. ii. Aligning KPIs Across Teams Different departments oftentimes work in silos. RevOps should strive to align these departments and check if these KPIs match the overall business objectives. Gaps must be closed if their KPIs don’t align. iii. Setting RevOps KPIs As you approach the end of the first 30 days, start establishing RevOps-specific KPIs that match company goals, which may involve metrics like revenue increase, conversion rates, or improvements in overall efficiency. 3. Tech Stack Audit Deep dive into the existing tools that your company is using. Identify all redundancies, and find opportunities to streamline the entire tech stack. i. Map Out Tools Compile a list of all tools used by teams, noting their purpose and how they work with the CRM. ii. Evaluate Use and Cost Determine if tools are actively used or if there are duplicates. Look for cost-saving opportunities by consolidating tools when possible. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVDJ9KI1tGw&t=869s Next 30 days – Alignment and Control The next 30 days marks a shift from discovery to alignment. The goals should be to create cohesion between departments (e.g., Sales, Marketing) and laying down effective controls. The improvements need to be implemented without overwhelming the teams. This phase combines further exploration with actionable improvements with the primary task being bringing the teams into sync. 1. Ways to bring your teams together i. Encouraging cross-team collaboration by addressing silos and ensuring all teams work toward shared quarterly or company-wide goals. ii. By creating alignment, you help teams see RevOps as a support system rather than an enforcer. This keeps communication channels open and creates buy-in. iii. Based on your findings, introduce controls wherever needed to improve workflow. Example: If close dates aren’t being recorded properly, this could skew reports. Meet with sales, identify the root cause (e.g., manual data entry that is taking too much of a reps’ time), and provide solutions or tools to make their tasks easier. Ensure that controls are practical and developed with the trust built in the first 30 days. Foster internal consensus within teams so that these improvements are adopted seamlessly. 2. Navigate Organizational Politics (i) Barrier Removal Larger organizations may have internal politics or ingrained processes that resist change. Find an internal “sponsor” who trusts and supports RevOps initiatives and can authorize actions to navigate any resistance. (ii) Trust and Consistency As you implement changes, make sure your efforts consistently demonstrate how RevOps can make work easier and more efficient for everyone. 3. Evolving the Tech Stack (i) Assessing Tech Needs If tools aren’t fully integrated (e.g., a tool not writing data back to the CRM), identify their gaps and consider evolving the tech stack. (ii) Holistic View Use insights from the discovery and alignment phases to start envisioning necessary tech improvements that align with company goals. Beginning of the 90-Day Phase: Vision and Execution This phase, described as “Vision and Execution,” involves shaping and executing a strategy based on insights gathered from the discovery and alignment phases. a. Roadmap Creation Create a roadmap covering the next two quarters, focusing on long-term, high-impact changes that align with business goals. Use learnings based on stakeholder needs, organizational goals, and the findings from the first 60 days i. Set Priorities Collaborate with end users (Sales, Marketing, Customer Success) to understand their pressing needs and align the roadmap with these needs. ii. Strategic Execution Prioritize initiatives that will have immediate revenue impact

Growing Beyond $1M ARR: Mistakes to Avoid in the Valley of Death
Growing Beyond $1M ARR: Mistakes to Avoid in the Valley of Death RevOps 10 min If you are a SaaS business that has crossed the $1m ARR mark, congratulations! You belong to a group of <1% of businesses that manage to reach this number. A bigger challenge lies ahead in the form of the valley of death. Only 4% of SaaS companies reach $1 million in revenue, and only 0.4% make it to $10 million. This is the Valley of Death that has eliminated countless businesses. Scaling to $10 million ARR and beyond is where a lot of promising startups dissolve. As revenue numbers increase, that number shrinks even more. What is the Valley of Death? The valley of death is that period in the life of a start-up where it has begun operations, but hasn’t started generating revenue. From a start-up receiving its initial capital contribution until it finally starts to generate revenue is what this period covers. The valley of death is a challenging period for start-ups. This period marks a heightened risk of failure. The longer the time spent in the valley of death, the higher the chances of the company fizzling out. Surviving this death valley is considered a significant milestone for a start-up. It signals better chances of the company reaching maturity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oPwF4TeXSQ4&t=5s Carving the Journey from $0-$50 Million According to Abhijeet Vijayvergiya, CEO at Nektar.ai, all start-ups go through similar challenges and they have to navigate through them. The challenges a startup will face at $0-$1m journey will be very different from the challenges at $10-$25m, or $25-$50m. Each stage requires a different approach. Let’s deep dive. 1. Getting to $1 million – Find your Product Market Fit In the 0-1 journey, focusing on the core mission of why a startup was formulated is key. This is the stage where founders try to validate their product’s value proposition. They answer questions like: Is there a market for my product? Is there a product fit to that market? Focus is key in this stage. Trying to do a bunch of different things and picking up on what works can be a recipe for disaster. $0-1m is more about taking calibrated steps that help a founder validate their value proposition. A lot of startups fail to go beyond this stage is because of a lack of focus. It’s very easy to get distracted. I think a lot of startups die because they lose focus and they get distracted from their core mission. This does not mean that you can’t pivot. You definitely should pivot when you evolve as a company, you achieve product market fit or you see traction. But at the same time, you should not be doing too many things. That’s a very common mistake I have seen that a lot of start-ups make. Figure out what you’re solving for. Every start-up starts with a vision. You have a problem that you feel is unsolved and something that you can uniquely solve in a way nobody is solving it today. And you can do it X times better in case it’s already sold by somebody. Abhijeet Vijayvergiya Trying to force growth is what makes several startups fail to go beyond this stage. Abhijeet says that an initial team member will always see whether there is a product market fit or not. He advises founders to not force the scale of motion till the time they hit that product market fit. In the 0-1 million journey, it’s important for any startup to stay focused, get to that product market fit, iterate fast, evolve to solve the problem that was intended for, and do all of it in a way that there is a commercial value attached to it. 2. $1m – $10m – Double Down on what Has Worked This is where the valley of death begins. A stage where you are with a million dollars in revenue with a core value proposition that is validated. But you have this looming danger of scaling to $10 million, where a very minuscule number of startups are able to successfully achieve. So how do you do that? According to Abhijeet, if a startup has achieved product market fit, they will be in a great position to start scaling. He warns against startups starting to open new markets, launch new products, or start talking to different sectors of customers, all in a haste to reach 10 million ARR. What’s important is to constantly look at the problem that the company has solved and how they have solved it. Learn from that and templatize all those learnings into a playbook. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSI_OSEpot8 Do more of what has worked for you. Just doing this makes the $1-$10m journey quite easy. In my past experience, we figured out how the founders sold to the first 5, 10, 20 and 50 people. We could really onboard sales teams in a way that they started delivering their first deal within the first 6 months of joining in a new market. Abhijeet Vijayvergiya Abhijeet also emphasizes on the importance of customer retention while talking of his experience at Capillary Technologies. He says, “We did a great job at retaining our customers. We still have the lowest churn rate in the industry. We’ve always focused on delivering that delight to our users and customers so that they become our evangelists.” Surviving the valley of death requires founders to understand the pain their company is solving for. They need to be really looking at why the company or the product exists in the first place. Founders also need to find a way to covert the tribal knowledge floating in their minds into a working playbook that can be executed. “The first and foremost thing that you should do once you hit a product market fit & you’re looking to scale and ramp up is to articulate that knowledge that is in your head into a playbook and templatize it. That gives you a solid foundation and a scalable model,” advises Abhijeet. 3. The Journey from $10m to

Top 10 Sales Methodologies to Use in 2025
Top 10 Sales Methodologies to Use in 2025 RevOps 10 min Every business out there is trying to sell something, whether it’s tangible products, services, knowledge, or software. But the real question is – are they keeping up with the changing trends in customer buying patterns? Customers have become wiser, and their preferences & behavior have evolved with time. To cement this statement, today, 67% of customers now prefer self-service over speaking to a company representative. As a result, businesses must tailor their sales methods to meet such changing needs. It’s not enough to just sell something; they need to do it in a way that resonates with the customer and meets their expectations. Businesses often struggle to do just this without a structured and strategic approach. After-effects? Poor sales results and low adoption. Implementing the right sales methodology can help you stay on track and focus on the customer journey. But there are many sales methodologies out there that can be confusing. Which is why we have created this exclusive guide for you. In this article, we will walk you through the basics of sales methodologies and the top 10 sales methodologies to use for selling to the modern customer of today. Keep reading! What is a Sales Methodology? Sales methodologies are a systematic and strategic approach to the sales process. They involve a set of principles and practices that guide sales teams in their interactions with customers. The ultimate goal is to gain a better understanding of customers’ needs, foster trust, and ultimately increase the chances of closing more deals. The history of sales methodologies dates back to the early 20th century when sales techniques were mainly focused on personal persuasion and hard-selling tactics. However, in the 1950s, the concept of consultative selling emerged, which prioritized building relationships with customers and understanding their needs. This approach got popular in the book “Spin Selling” by Neil Rackham in the late 1980s. Since then, many sales methodologies have emerged, each with its unique features and benefits. Some of the most popular sales methodologies include the Challenger Sale, Solution Selling, MEDDIC, SPIN Selling, and Value Selling, among others. But, how are these methodologies different from the sales process? That’s what the next section is about. Sales Methodology vs Sales Process Sales methodology is a framework that guides salespeople in their approach to selling, with the aim of understanding customer needs, fostering trust, and winning more deals. It includes principles and practices that inform the sales team’s overall strategy for selling, such as how to approach customers, how to position products or services, how to handle objections and more. On the other hand, a sales process is a series of steps that a sales team takes to move a potential customer from initial contact to closing a sale. The process typically includes stages such as prospecting, lead qualification, needs assessment, presentation, and demonstration, negotiation, and closing. This process can be mapped out in a flowchart or diagram. To be precise, sales methodology is an overarching philosophy to sell while the sales process outlines the specific steps that reps need to follow for carrying out that sales methodology. Advantages of Sales Methodologies Sales methodologies can greatly help a business and fuel its sales efforts in more ways than one. 1. Increased efficiency It provides a structured approach to selling, helping salespeople to be more organized and efficient in their work. 2. Improved customer satisfaction It helps to build trust with customers by focusing on understanding their needs and pain points. 3. Personalized sales It enables salespeople to tailor their approach to different customers, based on their unique buying motivations and preferences. 4. Better collaboration It facilitates teamwork among sales team members, who can work together more effectively when they are all following the same methodology. 5. Measurable sales efforts It makes it easier to track progress and measure success, as each step of the sales process is clearly defined and measurable. 6. Sales optimization It helps to identify areas for improvement, as businesses can analyze their sales data to see which parts of the methodology are working well and which need to be adjusted. 7. Guaranteed sales It leads to better sales results as salespeople are equipped with a proven approach to selling that has been shown to be successful in similar situations. This is not it! Having sales methodologies in place has immense benefits and it is more like having a map in the jungle. It helps your sales teams navigate through the complex and often unpredictable sales landscape. With a well-defined methodology, they can stay on the path toward achieving their sales goals and ultimately, closing more deals and bringing more money into your business. How to Choose the Best Sales Methodology for your Business As an industry, we cling to this incorrect notion that there’s a single best way to sell. We select a sales process or methodology that we believe is a “best practice,’ and we tell our sellers to repeat that same sales approach with every customer in every circumstance. It’s a fundamentally flawed strategy . Dr. Leff Bonney, Marketing Professor When it comes to selecting the right sales methodology for your business, there are a few key things that you simply shouldn’t ignore. It’s essential to take the time to carefully consider these factors and not rush into a decision without proper evaluation. 1. Needs of your target audience Your customers’ needs, preferences, and buying habits should be at the center of your decision of selecting a sales methodology. For instance, if your customers tend to do their own research and make decisions independently, a self-service approach like Value Selling Framework could be a good choice. On the other hand, if your customers prefer a more interactive approach, a hands-on technique like Spin Selling might be a better fit. 2. Sales cycle & complexity The duration and complexity of the sales process can be different for every business. It depends on a few factors like what you’re selling, how the decision-making works, and how many people are involved in