Account Based Marketing vs Lead Generation: Why It’s Time to Rethink Your Strategy
A conversation with Kristina Jaramillo, President at Personal ABM.
In today’s B2B world, account based marketing vs lead generation isn’t just a battle of tactics—it’s a clash of mindsets. While lead generation focuses on volume and filling the top of the funnel, account-based marketing (ABM) is about precision, alignment, and long-term revenue growth.
But here’s the catch: many companies think they’re doing ABM when they’re really just putting a shiny label on their old lead-gen playbooks. According to Kristina Jaramillo, President of Personal ABM, true ABM is not a campaign—it’s a strategic transformation.
The Problem: ABM is Misunderstood and Misapplied
“ABM isn’t just better targeting. It’s a company-wide go-to-market strategy that aligns marketing, sales, customer success, and product around shared revenue goals.”
Most organizations jump into ABM by identifying a list of accounts, defining a few goals, and layering campaigns on top of existing demand gen efforts. But they fail to rethink their content, messaging, team structure, or go-to-market motions. In essence, they’re doing targeted lead generation, not ABM.
| Element | Lead Generation | Account Based Marketing |
|---|---|---|
| Goal | Generate as many leads as possible | Land and expand strategic accounts |
| Measurement | MQLs, form fills, engagement rates | Stage progression, win rates, NRR |
| Ownership | Primarily marketing | Cross-functional: Sales, Marketing, CS, RevOps |
| Approach | One-to-many campaigns | 1:1, 1:few, or 1:many with personalization |
| Content | Generic and persona-based | Account-specific and insight-driven |
Why ABM Often Fails to Deliver Revenue
Here’s what Kristina sees time and time again:
Companies treat ABM as a bolt-on tactic, not a fundamental shift.
Sales and marketing aren’t aligned on account selection, goals, or success metrics.
The program lacks executive sponsorship and cross-functional ownership.
Teams don’t tailor messaging to strategic priorities or address the status quo bias in buying committees.
ABM is measured with tactical metrics like MQAs, not business outcomes.
ABM can’t be delegated to a single marketing manager or retrofitted to an existing funnel. It has to be designed to solve the biggest revenue problems—whether that’s breaking into enterprise accounts, reducing churn, or expanding current customers.
A Better Approach to ABM: Start With the Revenue Gaps
Kristina’s team begins every ABM engagement by identifying where the revenue leaks are:
Are we losing to competitors we should beat?
Are customers churning after a short term?
Are we unable to move upmarket?
Once the problem is clear, the strategy follows:
Align sales, marketing, CS, and RevOps around shared objectives.
Redefine the Ideal Customer Profile (ICP) based on high-value customers.
Develop account-specific messaging tied to strategic business priorities.
Focus on internal buyer enablement, not just external outreach.
Track meaningful KPIs like deal velocity, ACV growth, and multi-threading success.
“ABM is not about the next deal. It’s about driving the greatest revenue streams year over year.”
Don't Just Buy Tech. Build Strategy First
Intent platforms like 6sense and Demandbase have become synonymous with ABM—but Kristina cautions against this mindset.
“ABM tech doesn’t equal ABM strategy. Buying a platform doesn’t fix broken processes or align your teams.”
Intent data only reflects current behaviors—it’s speculative, not predictive. It doesn’t tell you if the account is culturally aligned, ready for change, or worth pursuing. Tech should enable a strategy—not define it.
Real-World Proof: How Messaging Changed Everything
Kristina shared the story of a freight analytics company struggling to expand deal sizes. Their content was aimed at transportation managers—the platform users—not decision-makers. Their main competitor even offered a similar solution for free.
By shifting the messaging to show how their platform integrated with demand forecasting, inventory management, and margin protection, they repositioned their value for C-suite leaders. That shift helped them land and expand accounts on Gartner’s Top 25 Supply Chain list.
Metrics That Matter in ABM
To measure ABM success, forget MQLs. Kristina recommends focusing on:
Stage progression
ACV growth
Win rates against competitors
Engagement with C-suite buyers
NRR (Net Revenue Retention)
“If your ABM isn’t improving deal size, win rate, and retention—you’re not doing ABM.”
Final Thoughts: Time to Kill the Triangle
One of Kristina’s boldest takeaways? It’s time to ditch the outdated ABM pyramid.
The one-to-many → one-to-few → one-to-one model is too rigid and siloed. Instead, think of it as a dynamic funnel, where high-fit accounts earn deeper personalization based on engagement, strategic fit, and growth potential.
TL;DR: Account Based Marketing vs Lead Generation
ABM isn’t an evolution of lead gen—it’s a fundamentally different strategy.
ABM focuses on revenue, retention, and relationship building, not just pipeline.
True ABM requires executive sponsorship, team alignment, and account-specific engagement.
Tech alone won’t save you—strategy must come first.
Kill the pyramid. Build programs that are integrated, adaptive, and focused on the entire account journey.
Want to hear more stories from revenue leaders? Subscribe to The Revenue Lounge podcast to never miss an episode!
More Resources
How to Strategically Engage and Conquer Buying committees
Delve into the complexities of engaging buying groups and unveiling strategic approaches to conquer the challenges that arise. In Sales, the key to accelerating deals lies in understanding the nuances of buying group dynamics.
5 Steps to Navigate Buying Groups in 2025: A RevOps Guide
5 Steps to Navigate Buying Groups in 2025: A RevOps Guide RevOps 10 min In today’s business environment, B2B buying is never just one person. According to Forrester Research, more than half of global business buyers purchase in complex buying scenarios that include more people, more departments, and generally higher price points. And this buying group can be made up of 7 to 20 people! Unlocking the power of buying groups is a crucial aspect of the B2B landscape. This blog is a synopsis of our conversation with revenue operations leader, Nandini Karkare. She is currently the SVP of RevOps at Zywave. Nandini suggests strategic steps to navigate through the realms of Revenue Operations and helps uncover the strategies, insights, and best practices that constitute a comprehensive guide to mastering the dynamics of buying groups. Read on to get actionable tips on how you can navigate buying groups in 2025 (and beyond). And implement the learnings to create a winning GTM motion. Here are the 5 steps Nandini recommends: 1. Decode Your Buying Groups The buying groups typically consist of members from departments and they all contribute different aspects. It is critical to understand the scope of decision-making including the people who play the most significant roles in making the call. Gartner’s report on B2B Buying highlights that 77% of B2B purchases involve a buying group of four or more people. PS: The key stakeholder can turn out someone altogether different from who you had building a relationship with all along. a. Capturing Buying Group Members Effective buying group management means considering not just decision-makers but influential stakeholders across departments. Misidentifying key players or focusing solely on the main contact risks derailing the sale. (i) How can you map the entire buying group efficiently? Leverage internal and external data to identify the key players Segment the Group by Role and Influence (ii) Not everyone in the buying group holds equal power or influence. Segment them into categories: Decision-makers (who give the final heads-up) Influencers (who sway the decision) Users (who use the product and provide feedback) Budget owners b. The Role Transition Within a Buying Group Moving the focus from a buying group to a renewal or expansion committee includes knowing precisely who remains in the relationship, as well as who becomes more active as an account grows. (i) New roles may emerge in a Buying Group Technical or operational leaders may become more influential post sale, since they are now using the product. (ii) The focus shifts from buying to renewal The interaction should be more about the return on investment (ROI) of the product placed on the market, ongoing value delivery, and ongoing needs. (iii) Alignment between the buying groups and renewal committee Leveraging the same enthusiasm and relationships generated at the first-buying stage helps in anchoring the transitions and preventing any drop-offs in engagement. Related Resource: Navigate Enterprise Buying Committees: Strategies for Driving Alignment c. Understand the Personal and Collective Priorities of a Buying Group As per McKinsey & Company, B2B buying decisions increasingly require engagement across departments, with 60% of purchasing committees including members from outside traditional procurement, like IT and HR. (i)Alignment Between C-Suite and Technical Teams Decisions aren’t Made in a Vacuum Collaboration between C-suite and technical teams ensures a holistic approach to solving customer problems, creating stronger, more sustainable relationships Their cross departmental collaboration can help with: (ii) Alignment on Strategic Goals C suite executives need technical assistance to translate their strategic vision to reality that also aligns with company-wide objectives. (iii) Technical Validation These insights guide the C-suite in making informed decisions that fit technical infrastructure and future-proofing. (iv) Cross-functional Communication Bridging the gap between these two groups involves continuous, open communication, ensuring that technical evaluations don’t delay business goals but instead support them cohesively. iii. Understand the Product Take product demos, listen to sales calls, and use tools that show how the product is sold. This helps in understanding the customer needs better. iv. Dive into Your CRM Understand your CRM (whether Salesforce or HubSpot) to assess how the data is organized. This is to check whether it’s easy to use, and identify immediate improvements. The CRM should be the central source of truth, with other tools supporting it. The data should be unified with easier adoption for the teams. v. Build Trust Internally Establish trust within your teams by listening carefully, asking questions about how RevOps can help, and addressing quick fixes to show you’re there to help. Having this trust shows them that you’re here to support their success. Quick wins, such as small fixes that make people’s jobs easier, helps in establishing credibility early. 2. Establish Clear KPIs i. Understanding Team KPIs It is important to ask you stakeholders about the KPIs that matter to understand their goals and what their expectations are. ii. Aligning KPIs Across Teams Different departments oftentimes work in silos. RevOps should strive to align these departments and check if these KPIs match the overall business objectives. Gaps must be closed if their KPIs don’t align. iii. Setting RevOps KPIs As you approach the end of the first 30 days, start establishing RevOps-specific KPIs that match company goals, which may involve metrics like revenue increase, conversion rates, or improvements in overall efficiency. 3. Tech Stack Audit Deep dive into the existing tools that your company is using. Identify all redundancies, and find opportunities to streamline the entire tech stack. i. Map Out Tools Compile a list of all tools used by teams, noting their purpose and how they work with the CRM. ii. Evaluate Use and Cost Determine if tools are actively used or if there are duplicates. Look for cost-saving opportunities by consolidating tools when possible. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sVDJ9KI1tGw&t=869s Next 30 days – Alignment and Control The next 30 days marks a shift from discovery to alignment. The goals should be to create cohesion between departments (e.g., Sales, Marketing) and laying down effective controls. The improvements need to be implemented without overwhelming the teams. This phase combines